After months waiting, this story could have ended in 3 different ways:
- The ICANN board would have allowed both application to proceed but this would could have caused diplomatic...problems between the EU and ICANN and serious anger from part of the wine Community;
- The ICANN board would have ended all applications. In this case it would have meant that there would not have been any .WINE and .VIN domain names before the second round of applications.
- The ICANN board would have delayed again to give one last chance to applicants. It is precisely what happened: the ICANN Board delayed again to the next ICANN meeting in Buenos Aires in November 2013.
It is now in the hands of
the GAC .WINE and .VIN applicants to demonstrate they want to win their application(s): will they just sit on their chair an "wait" like they just did until now or will they try to come with solutions?
Below if the copy of the ICANN Board's answer to the GAC:
"The ICANN Board New gTLD Program Committee (NGPC) met on 28 September 2013 and, among other things, adopted a scorecard of remaining advice from the Beijing and Durban GAC
Communiqués. The scorecard, available here, reflects the following:
.wine and .vin: On 9 September 2013, the NGPC received a letter from Heather Dryden to
Steve Crocker re: .wine and .vin. The letter noted that there is no GAC consensus advice on
additional specific safeguards, and that the GAC or its members may communicate further
details to the Board as to the nature of the differences in views.
As such, the NGPC stands ready to hear from GAC members as to the nature of the differences in views expressed in the advice while the NGPC is analyzing the community input received on this advice.
The NGPC directs staff to analyze the GAC advice and other community input received on this
issue, and prepare an analysis and recommendation for decision at the NGPC meeting in
The letter can be downladed here: